tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-632928765983902491.post8749605320463933528..comments2023-05-31T08:13:57.522-06:00Comments on The Ultimate Answer to Kings: Doing my tiny bit to further the Streisand Effect...Joelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03442354270552212335noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-632928765983902491.post-88490489732995161992012-01-28T08:50:19.430-07:002012-01-28T08:50:19.430-07:00And you're quite right, and the writer is wron...And you're quite right, and the writer is wrong. (There's a clever word play in there somewhere, so be at peace concerning your grammatical skills.)Joelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03442354270552212335noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-632928765983902491.post-37789533952280998842012-01-27T19:31:13.087-07:002012-01-27T19:31:13.087-07:00I would also like to add: where the hell have my g...I would also like to add: where the hell have my grammar and sentence structure been for the past few months? Did you steal my Precious?Brassnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-632928765983902491.post-30951545055996178352012-01-27T19:29:06.913-07:002012-01-27T19:29:06.913-07:00I agree that their actions as described, (though I...I agree that their actions as described, (though I don't know if we're getting <i>100%</i> of the story, considering the source,) is indeed stupid and despicable.Brassnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-632928765983902491.post-91530100148883952572012-01-27T19:26:48.090-07:002012-01-27T19:26:48.090-07:00Joel, the article did. (I realize after I submitte...Joel, the article did. (I realize after I submitted the comment that I should have given a bit of context.) He said, "Talk about disrespect for First Amendment free speech rights!"Brassnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-632928765983902491.post-67796663882669128582012-01-27T14:35:18.076-07:002012-01-27T14:35:18.076-07:00True. Who said it was?
A private company convinc...True. Who said it was?<br /><br />A private company convincing another private organization to <b>shut somebody else up</b> is stupid and despicable, but it's not a violation of the first amendment.Joelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03442354270552212335noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-632928765983902491.post-27709683126508591762012-01-27T14:28:05.819-07:002012-01-27T14:28:05.819-07:00A private company convincing another private organ...A private company convincing another private organization is not a violation of the First Amendment.Brassnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-632928765983902491.post-69614264174923737882012-01-27T10:28:31.517-07:002012-01-27T10:28:31.517-07:00Hmmm, can't shoot a Glock anyway. :) But I do ...Hmmm, can't shoot a Glock anyway. :) But I do love the Springfield XD guns. <br /><br />As you said... I don't look a gift horse in the mouth. If it shoots reliably and doesn't break all the time, I'm good. <br /><br />There are evidently some dipshits at the Glock company. Might need to remind them of what happened to S&W for a while...MamaLibertyhttp://www.thepriceofliberty.orgnoreply@blogger.com