I know this is kind of old, but I just saw it this morning, courtesy of Radley Balko. It concerns a Tea Party rally in Phoenix, Arizona:
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio gave the main speech, focusing largely on his signature issue of illegal immigration. But the former Drug Enforcement Administration agent also blasted the federal government as wasteful and said he wasn’t worried about federal investigators looking into his law enforcement tactics, which have led to accusations of racial profiling.Joe Arpaio. Keynote speaker at a Tea Party rally. There's a strange combination.
When I was a kid in a Detroit public school, there was a ritual where kids were picked for sides in a baseball game. Each designated team captain would pick a kid, who would then go to the right or left of the bunch depending on who picked him. The criteria for who got picked first were generally pretty logical; size, strength, prior demonstrations of competence. There were always kids left over; kids that the team captains would have just sent home, given the option. That ritual came to mind while I read that Tribune article this morning.
In my fantasy, I bunched up everybody who called himself a lover of liberty. I held up a picture of Joe Arpaio and asked each one, "What do you think of this guy?"
And whenever somebody said, "Oh, man! America's Toughest Sheriff! I love that guy!" I sent him home. Not my type; don't want him on my side.
Listen to me, because this is very important. I'm no great guru, but I do know this: Liberty isn't about countries. It isn't about groups, or parties, or ideologies. Liberty is about people, it's about individuals. You either love liberty for everybody, or you don't love liberty. Because liberty is not a privilege bestowed upon the blessed few who were born in the "Land of the Free." Liberty is a natural right. You were born with the right to your own individual liberty, and so was that brown guy in the dirty jeans.
Now yeah: If he came here without his paperwork in order, he had to know he was breaking the country's laws and he chose to take his chances with that, just like you or I take our chances when we choose to break a law. But let me ask you: Do you cheer on the Forces of Law and Order when they bust some guy for illegally defending his home with a gun? Do you cheer on the ATF when it prosecutes an FFL for not keeping his paperwork carefully in order? I'll bet you don't. What's the principal difference? The law is the law, right?
I'm not going to argue "free schooling," or "free healthcare." Those are separate issues. You get more of what you subsidize; that's a basic law of economics that any dolt should be able to see. I don't take "free" stuff that's paid for by unwilling others, but I'm getting older and my legs are bad. Someday I'm going to have to make a choice between taking that "free" stuff stolen from others, or putting a shotgun in my mouth because I live in the desert and we're fresh out of ice floes. Which way will I go? Probably the former: I'm not quite that principled. So I'm not going to argue about ideological purity when it comes to matters of government-provided "welfare." On that issue, I live in a glass house. But what I will argue - what I will insist upon - is that if you think liberty is only for people like you, if you don't love liberty for people who aren't like you, you don't love liberty.
Your opinion of Joe Arpaio is a perfect litmus test of that. Joe Arpaio is a petty, brutal little tyrant who gets off on hurting people. I despise him. There's nothing I can do about him, and unless you're one of those Maricopa County voters who keeps him in his job there's nothing you can do about him, either. There's no shame in being genuinely helpless about a situation somewhere else.
But if you're one of those who cheer on "America's Toughest Sheriff" because he's only hurting those "other" people, people you don't like, the "illegal aliens" or the non-violent drug users, then face a fact: You are not a lover of liberty. I don't want you on my team. Go home.






















